ddr dimm memory slots definition slot novomatic
casino slots kidderminster online casino company philippines mansion casino promo code best smart mobile below 20000
casinos near dania beach fl titan casino 20 bonus code baccarat online in usa casino red flush flash best car finance company for bad credit fruit king machine
casino barcelona film online casino supermarket disneyland paris online casino gambling in nj 888 casino online slots mobile homes for sale in ireland
winner casino mobile blackjack game online play online casinos that accept paypal casino slot sites wizard of oz online casino nearest casino to knoxville tennessee
play now online blackjack real money mac jackpot casino rapid city south dakota
lakeside inn lake tahoe reviews casino montreal poker schedule usa online casinos that use paypal
bonus casino en ligne online live roulette usa
casino miami valley no deposit mobile casino usa bonus codes ameba pigg mobile spin best buy apple black friday no deposit casino keep what you win best slot machine payout las vegas
mobile casino deposit mobile billing casino beach park mbit casino online blackjack us players
casino nsw business for sale slot machine jammer app wolf siberian best desktop deals black friday 2018
casino games konami roulette game buy online 10 bet mobile app virgin mobile call rates australia
live roulette techniques bonus armor slots casino slot machine hacker biggest online casino wins 2018
casino slot machines ebay casino online venezuela best buy in usa laptop casino slots online play 5 dragons slot machine android app
denver casinos vegas casino online no deposit bonus codes

13 October 2015

Court Hearing on JRC - October 26!

Content/TW: Fairly descriptive discussion of torture and abuse of people with disabilities using electric shock in an institution.

htc mobile range 20000 to 30000 casino bus from austin to louisiana blackjack counting trainer online best casino slots california real tabletop slot machines for sale

There is a court hearing about the Judge Rotenberg Center (JRC) scheduled to begin on Monday, October 26 in the Bristol County Probate & Family Court in Taunton, Massachusetts. Arguments are expected to continue for around a month. If you are able to attend part or all of the hearing, which is open to the public, please do so! We need advocates in the courtroom! 
ice casino review online blackjack make money best slots casino
(This post is an explanation of why this is important, what the hearing is actually about, and for the uninitiated, what the JRC is. It starts with some background about the JRC, then gives the legal context.)
slot machine push buttons casino font internet pc card slot
Photo: Disability and youth rights advocates protesting aversive electric shock "treatment" outside the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in Silver Spring, Maryland in January 2013. Hand-drawn signs have slogans "No compromise on torture," "people not experiments," "Ban the GED" with a list of minor infractions shocks are used to punish, "stop the shocks," "disability rights are human rights," and "torture not treatment." From left to right: Diane Engster, Lydia Brown, Shain M. Neumeier, Kathleen N. O'Neal, and Patrick T. Ayers. Photo by Taylor C. Hall, T.C. Hall Media.mega casino slot cherry mobile spin 3g firmware jugar maquinas de casino gratis online fruit machine zapper

Background

The Judge Rotenberg Center was originally founded as the Behavior Research Institute. It didn't start shocking people (as it is now infamous for doing) until 1988, but since its beginning in 1971, founder Matthew Israel instituted a regime of pain to coerce behavioral modification for the children, youth, and adults with intellectual, developmental, and psych disabilities committed to his "care." Food deprivation. Prolonged restraint. Seclusion -- which is ultimately a form of solitary confinement in the name of "treatment." Forced inhalation of ammonia. Sensory assault with the notorious white noise-blasting helmet. Slaps. Pinches designed to maximize pain by digging nails into muscle. Since 1971, six people receiving "treatment" at BRI/JRC have died in their care -- Robert Cooper (d. 1980), Danny Aswad (d. 1981), Vincent Milletich (d. 1985), Silverio Gonzalez (d. 1998), Linda Cornelison (d. 1990), and Abigail Gibson (d. 1997).mobile coverage map western australia online casino deutschland test gambling addiction galway winning on slot machines in casinos novas slots machines gratis top mobile companies 2018 wikipedia online casino ohne einzahlung

Brandon Sanchez was the first resident to be subjected to electric shock. The device was called the SIBIS -- self-injurious behavior inhibiting system. Although staff at BRI/JRC have long known that darkened, cool, low-stimulation environments help Brandon Sanchez self-regulate and decompress, they began to treat his extreme self-harm by shocking him under the belief that association of unwanted behavior with painful stimuli would decrease the unwanted behavior. (In other words, it's like applying dog training tactics to humans, or at least humans deemed sub-human.) On one day, he received over 5,000 shocks from the SIBIS in a single day. After that, Matthew Israel asked the SIBIS manufacturer to build a stronger device. They refused.

Matthew Israel invented his own device, the graduated electronic decelerator (GED), which emitted a stronger current and shock than the SIBIS. The GED works by strapping electrodes on a person's arms, torso, and legs, which are activated when someone presses a button on a remote control. Over the past couple decades, the GED has gone through several iterations, each more powerful and painful than before. The present model in use, the GED-4, is designed to be more powerful and painful than a police taser.

Theoretically, the "therapy" is used to reduce or eliminate dangerous or aggressive behavior -- like someone picking at their eyes and causing a vision disability, or someone banging their head against a wall and causing a brain injury, or someone physically attacking other people. In reality, the aversive electric shocks are given for behavior ranging from closing eyes while walking in the hallway to trying to hold a staff person's hand, or from getting out of seat without permission to using swear words, or simply for non-compliance.

In April 2012, a medical malpractice lawsuit brought by the family of Andre McCollins went to trial before a jury, where video footage of the shocks was played in public for the first time (photosensitive epilepsy warning -- video flickers / also graphic footage of torture at this link). Ten years before, in 2002, Andre McCollins, a black autistic teenager with other cognitive and psych disabilities, had been shocked 31 times in 7 hours while restrained face-down in four-point restraints. The long shock session stemmed from a brief verbal interaction with a staff person who told him to take off his jacket, and he dared to say, "No." The shocks are as much for "non-compliance" as they are for anything else.

Since 1971, dedicated advocates including titans like Nancy Weiss, Fredda Brown, and Polyxane S. Cobb have fought to close the JRC and end their abusive practices. Survivors like Jennifer Msumba and Ian Cook testified in front of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Disability rights organizations across the country have repeatedly condemned the JRC, along with the current and immediately former U.N. Special Rapporteurs on Torture. But legislation has never made it through the Massachusetts State House. Congress has never passed any measure that would ban aversives and dangerous restraints and seclusion. The U.S. Department of Justice civil rights investigation has produced no fruitful results. The FDA has never issued a decision after hosting a public hearing about the possibility of banning electric shock aversives.
argosy casino poker room casino in las vegas 18 and over juegos gratis casino maquinas tragamonedas bonus
And Massachusetts' regulatory agencies (Department of Developmental Services -- formerly Department of Mental Retardation, Office of Children and Families, etc.) have been almost totally unable to do anything about the JRC because of the Massachusetts courts.online blackjack za no deposit bonus binary options brokers 2018 mobile online casino australia online casino for fun money live casino new york
no deposit australian online casinos live casino m88 for android list of online casino in the philippines tampa casino
(This explanation continues below the pictures.)make money online fast legit online casino joining offers casino euro mobile no deposit palace casino edmonton hours casino bonuses list roulette wheel lucky numbers tomb raider secret of the sword

Further reading:



live casino address juego gratis de casino slot casino san clemente ca mobile marketing for small business 2018 monopoly slots mod apk no survey

las vegas casino news 2018 cocoa casino gaming club casino no deposit bonus
Photo [top]: Judge Rotenberg Center employee Joe Andrade adjusting the strap with shock electrodes on  Andrew Goldberg's ankle. (Andrew Goldberg was named as a resident with developmental disabilities in the Concord Monitor.) Photo by Charles Krupa, 2014.spin the wheel star trek online wiki no deposit casino bonus codes march 2018 online roulette tools casino slot machine hire live casino rewards

Photo [bottom]: A Judge Rotenberg Center employee supervising a young student, who looks afraid, at a computer station. The employee's belt has at least four GED remote control activators hanging from it, each with a student's picture. Photo by Larry Sultan, 2007. 



Legal Context

In 1986, the Massachusetts Office of Children and Families tried to yank BRI's license to operate while issuing emergency orders essentially telling BRI to get its act together. In response, BRI sued the state government, accusing it of acting in bad faith and abusing its power to regulate by targeting just this one institution, and thereby violating the "rights" of students and parents for them to receive "treatment" at the BRI.

The case settled with a consent decree in 1987, which means that the court where the lawsuit was filed (Bristol County Probate and Family Court, as mentioned above) still has control of the case (as opposed to it being considered totally closed at the base court level). The consent decree was supposed to last for one year. It allowed BRI to keep operating as usual, but with one change -- if BRI wanted to subject anyone to invasive aversive treatments, it had to go to court and ask a judge to allow them to add the aversive treatments to the person's individual treatment plan. These special hearings are called "substituted judgment" proceedings, where the judge makes a decision about treatment based on what they think a disabled person would decide if they were "competent." (It's an incredibly ableist legal construct, but that's a topic for a whole other post.) In theory, those substituted judgment proceedings are supposed to be adversarial, meaning that the outcome could go either way -- maybe shock is added to the treatment plan, maybe not. In reality, since the institution of the consent decree, the judges in Bristol County Probate and Family Court have basically rubber stamped every BRI/JRC request to add electric shock to someone's treatment plan.

The consent decree was indefinitely extended, instead of ending in one year, and is still in force.

(BRI changed its name to Judge Rotenberg Center to honor the judge who oversaw the consent decree, once he died and it no longer looked totally weird to name the place after him.)

play casino slots as a guest san diego casino poker tournaments gambling questionnaire
In the mid-1990's, the Department of Mental Retardation (now Department of Developmental Services) denied JRC's request for certification to use certain aversives, including the electric shock. So JRC went to court, and DMR was held in contempt. The commissioner was forced to resign. DMR was placed into "receivership," with an outside person appointed by the court to take over everything DMR did involving the JRC -- for ten years (1996 - 2006).

On 14 February 2013, the Massachusetts Attorney General's office filed a motion to vacate the 1987 consent decree -- if granted, the motion means that everything in the consent decree now becomes null and void, and the Bristol County Probate and Family Court will no longer have control of the case. The court also has the option of allowing the motion in part, but not in whole. Overall, this means that there is decent possibility that JRC could lose the protection it has enjoyed for almost three decades from the courts.

The hearing scheduled to begin on October 26 is an evidentiary hearing on the motion. The state attorneys will present evidence in support of their motion to vacate, probably by arguing that the consent decree is irrelevant both a) in regard to how the state's agencies regulate JRC, and b) what treatments are considered acceptable for people with intellectual, developmental, and psych disabilities. JRC's attorneys will of course argue the opposite. (Ugh, them.)

So if you live anywhere near Taunton or can get there, consider going to the hearing!

slot machines on anthem of the seas ruleta game gambling terms no deposit casino bonus codes 2018 usa
victory casino cruise orlando fl soaring eagle casino dress code
the four kings casino and slots hack diceland casino no deposit bonus code online american roulette simulator
online gambling nj slots roulette zones online slot machines mega jack online gambling debt mobile apps for small businesses
malaysia online casino slot on net casino best payout online slot machines online casino faraon club gold casino coupon code no deposit bonus spread betting no deposit bonus november 2018 uk